Marshall jcm 2000 dsl 401 two-channel combo amplifier, and a great. Now it closely follows the more 'classic' design from the 1971 schematic. The total amount of employees at MB is less than 100. Schematics Book MARSHALL JCM 2000 DSL 50 Amp and Avatar Cab Speaker(w/ Celestion. Haha sorry but I have to ask. Filelist xml txt far cry 4 gameplay. I recently bought a dsl 100 and love the tone but I found a dsl 50 for the same price and sounds great also. Which do you guys prefer? I have always bought 50 watt heads I still have my jcm 2204 with a 1936/greenbacks. I can't use my dsl 100 with my 1936 don't want to blow my speakers would the dsl 50 be a better buy? (Also I don't have a 4x12 cab borrowing one from a friend at the moment) I play metal/punk. As a plus the 50 watt head looks brand new compared to the 100 watt head I have now which is a bit beat up. Haha sorry but I have to ask. I recently bought a dsl 100 and love the tone but I found a dsl 50 for the same price and sounds great also. Which do you guys prefer? I have always bought 50 watt heads I still have my jcm 2204 with a 1936/greenbacks. I can't use my dsl 100 with my 1936 don't want to blow my speakers would the dsl 50 be a better buy? (Also I don't have a 4x12 cab borrowing one from a friend at the moment) I play metal/punk. As a plus the 50 watt head looks brand new compared to the 100 watt head I have now which is a bit beat up. I got the DSL50 and a 2x12 greenback cab and it works fine. ![]() Unless youre planning on buying a new cab too, I'd go with the 50 so you can use your current cab. Way more bottom end, head room.well, more everything. Older Marshalls I prefer the 50watters.the get the distortion character quicker.but the DSL100 develops allot of great tone in its preamp so overall volume isn't necessary for good compression.making it more suitable for live performance.but when you turn it up.like any Marshall gets just better sounding. I loved my 4100.but a boosted DSL100's red channel DECIMATES any 4100's B channel boosted.no comparison period. Hamburg eddh aerosoft airbus a330. This question has been asked a lot on here. The problem with the JCM 2000 DSL100 is that they all sound different. I'm not sure if it's bc of quality control or differences in parts & tubes. If Cliff ever models the JCM 2000, hopefully he gets a few different ones, so he can average their tones and create a 'Best Of' JCM 2000 model. I haven't tried getting a JCM 2000 tone w/ FW 13 but in previous versions I came close using BRIT JVM, BRIT PRE, FRIEDMAN, and there was another one but I can't remember and I'm not in front of my Axe-Fx II. I was never a big fan of the TSL. I actually got a chance to A/B a TSL against the DSL and found the TSL to be much thinner and weaker sounding than the DSL. The sales guy in the store at the time told me, and I'm paraphrasing here, 'they got the guy who did the JCM 800's transformer to design the DSL's transformer, and they got the guy who designed the JCM 900's transformer to do the TSL's transformer.' I have no idea if that's true or not but judging from what I heard coming from the amps that day, what he said made sense. The DSL definitely had a much heavier, meatier footprint than the TSL. The difference was night and day. I was never a big fan of the TSL. I actually got a chance to A/B a TSL against the DSL and found the TSL to be much thinner and weaker sounding than the DSL. The sales guy in the store at the time told me, and I'm paraphrasing here, 'they got the guy who did the JCM 800's transformer to design the DSL's transformer, and they got the guy who designed the JCM 900's transformer to do the TSL's transformer.' I have no idea if that's true or not but judging from what I heard coming from the amps that day, what he said made sense.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |